Meniscal ramp lesion classification systems: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To describe the proposed classification systems for meniscal ramp lesions (RLs) in the literature and evaluate their accuracy and reliability. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines utilising PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Level I-IV studies referencing RLs along with either an arthroscopic- or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification system used to describe RL subtypes were included. RESULTS: In total, 21 clinical studies were included. Twenty-seven (79%) of the included studies were published in 2020 or later. There were four main classification systems proposed within the literature (two arthroscopic-, two MRI-based), describing tear patterns, mediolateral extent, associated ligament disruption and stability of the lesion. The first classification was proposed in 2015 by Thaunat et al. and is referenced in 22 (64.7%) of the included studies. The application of the Thaunat et al. criteria to MRI showed variable sensitivity (31.70%-93.8%) and interobserver agreement (k = 0.55-0.80). The Greif et al. modification to the Thaunat et al. system was referenced in 32.4% of the included studies and had a substantial interobserver agreement (k = 0.8). Stability to probing and specific tear location were each used to classify RLs in 28.6% and 23.8% of the included clinical studies, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although there has been a recent increase in the recognition and treatment of meniscal RLs, there is limited consistency in descriptive classifications used for this pathology. Current RL classification systems based on preoperative MRI have variable reliability, and arthroscopic examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis and classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Short- to Mid-Term Clinical and Radiological Results of Selective Laser Melting Highly Porous Titanium Cup in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate short- to mid-term clinical and radiological results in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a Selective Laser Melting 3D-printed highly porous titanium acetabular cup (Jump System Traser®, Permedica Orthopaedics). (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective study and collected prospective data on 125 consecutive patients who underwent primary THA with the use of highly porous titanium cup. Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with a clinical and radiological assessment. (3) Results: The final cohort consisted of 104 patients evaluated after a correct value of 52 (38-74) months. The median Harris Hip Score (HHS) significantly improved from 63.7 (16-95.8) preoperatively to 94.8 (38.2-95.8) postoperatively (p < 0.001), with higher improvement associated with higher age at surgery (ß = 0.22, p = 0.025). On postoperative radiographs, the average acetabular cup inclination and anteversion were 46° (30°-57°) and 15° (1°-32°), respectively. All cups radiographically showed signs of osseointegration with no radiolucency observed, or component loosening. (4) Conclusions: The use of this highly porous acetabular cup in primary THA achieved excellent clinical, functional, and radiological results at mid-term follow-up. A better clinical recovery can be expected in older patients. The radiological evaluation showed excellent osseointegration of the cup with complete absence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines.

Anterior Referencing versus Posterior Referencing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

(1) Background: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes between anterior referencing (AR) and posterior referencing (PR) systems in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). (2) Methods: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central databases were searched in August 2022. Data extracted for quantitative analysis included the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) index, knee ROM, posterior condylar offset (PCO), and the posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR). The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment. Randomized controlled trials were assessed with version 2 of the risk of bias tool (RoB2), recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. (3) Results: For the meta-analysis, five comparative studies met the eligibility criteria. There were 584 patients in all, 294 of whom had AR TKA and 290 of whom had PR TKA. Three studies with 181 and 179 cases in the AR and PR groups, respectively, had reported preoperative KSS. A statistically significant difference was found favoring the PR group. (p = 0.01). The same cases' postoperative range of motion was documented, and a statistically significant difference was discovered in favor of the AR group. Postoperative PCO was described in four studies in 243 and 241 cases in the AR and PR TKA groups, respectively, and a statistically significant difference was found with a higher postoperative PCO in the PR group (p = 0.003). Postoperative PCOR was calculated in two studies in the same cases in the AR and PR TKA groups and a statistically significant difference was found with a higher postoperative PCOR in the PR group (p = 0.002). (4) Conclusion: Anterior referencing for TKA may result in improved knee ROM postoperatively, while posterior referencing may produce larger PCO and PCOR on postoperative imaging. However, no significant differences were noted in clinical outcomes between the AR and PR groups at final follow-up.

How to Avoid Common Complications in Hamstrings Harvest for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Practical Guide.

More than 100,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are performed annually in the United States and one of the most common autografts for ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is the HS tendons. Nevertheless, proper HS harvest can be challenging, and several complications can be encountered, including, iatrogenic neurovascular damage, premature amputation of the tendons, graft contamination, and postoperative hematoma. The aim of this technical note is to describe a safe and effective technique for autologous HS tendon harvest in ACLR.

Meniscus tears treatment: The good, the bad and the ugly-patterns classification and practical guide.

Over the years, several studies demonstrated the crucial role of knee menisci in joint biomechanics. As a result, save the meniscus has become the new imperative nowadays, and more and more studies addressed this topic. The huge amount of data on this topic may create confusion in those who want to approach this surgery. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for treatment of meniscus tears, including an overview of technical aspects, outcomes in the literature and personal tips. Taking inspiration from a famous movie directed by Sergio Leone in 1966, the authors classified meniscus tears in three categories: The good, the bad and the ugly lesions. The inclusion in each group was determined by the lesion pattern, its biomechanical effects on knee joint, the technical challenge, and prognosis. This classification is not intended to substitute the currently proposed classifications on meniscus tears but aims at offering a reader-friendly narrative review of an otherwise difficult topic. Furthermore, the authors provide a concise premise to deal with some aspects of menisci phylogeny, anatomy and biomechanics.

Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and the common autograft specimens for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

A thorough understanding of the anatomical properties of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), as well as the native specimens that are most commonly considered as viable autograft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), is warranted for continuing to pursue the best-possible graft choice for patients undergoing ACLR. While a wide variety of graft choices remain available to the operating surgeon, choosing the correct graft choice remains a consideration and discussion with patients on the pros and cons of each option. This article combines a review of the current literature on the quantitative and qualitative anatomy of the native ACL and common autograft specimens with the expert consensus of the senior author on the surgically-pertinent anatomy of these structures. The purpose of this article is to review the anatomy pertaining to the native ACL, along with the distal anatomy of the hamstring tendons, patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon (QT). Multiple tendinous and ligamentous structures exist around the knee that serve as viable candidates for use as autologous grafts for ACLR, and the anatomy of these distal extents of these structures are discussed thoroughly, including bony attachments, quantitative and relational anatomy, cross sectional area, and histological features of these structures.

Arthroscopic Repair of Posterior Root Tears of the Lateral Meniscus with All-Suture Anchor.

Meniscus root tears are increasingly being recognized and treated because of improved awareness and diagnostics. These injuries commonly occur in combination with knee ligament injuries. Untreated posterior meniscus root teats have been demonstrated to increase contact pressure and decrease contact area, ultimately leading to unfavorable joint loading and development of early osteoarthritis. Posterior lateral meniscus root tears (PLMRTs) also have been reported to increase anterior tibial translation and pivot shift in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Therefore, it is crucial to repair meniscal root tears when possible to restore knee joint loading and kinematics. Several techniques for repair of the PLMRT have been described. In this Technical Note, we describe our preferred technique for repair of PLMRT using an all-suture anchor. This technique is reproducible, does not need a tunnel, mitigates bungee effect of transtibial technique, and the anchor can easily be inserted on the footprint without a need for a guide.

Free Bone Cement Fragments Leading to a Locked Knee 3 Years after Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a reliable alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis. UKA provides a lot of potential advantages over TKA and is related to less overall morbidity and mortality compared with TKA. Rare complications are limitation of knee movement and a clicking sensation associated with cement extrusion, both after UKA and TKA. In this report, we describe a patient who required arthroscopic removal of free bone cement fragments 3 years after a minimally invasive UKA.

SLAP lesions: current controversies.

Knowledge of the pertinent anatomy, pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment of the spectrum of injuries involving the superior glenoid labrum and biceps origin is required in treating the patient with a superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tear.Despite the plethora of literature regarding SLAP lesions, their clinical diagnosis remains challenging for a number of reasons.First, the diagnostic value of many of the available physical examination tests is inconsistent and ambiguous.Second, SLAP lesions most commonly occur concomitantly with other shoulder injuries.Third, SLAP lesions have no specific associated pain pattern.Outcomes following surgical treatment of SLAP tears vary depending on the method of treatment, associated pathology and patient characteristics.Biceps tenodesis has been receiving increasing attention as a possible treatment for SLAP tears. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:25-32. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180033.

All-Arthroscopic Treatment of Intra- and Extra-Articular Localized Villonodular Synovitis of Knee.

Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) is a rare, benign, proliferative neoplastic condition affecting synovial-lined anatomic spaces. PVNS is characterized by hypertrophy of a synovial membrane by villous, nodular, and villonodular proliferation, with pigmentation secondary to hemosiderin deposition. The two forms of PVNS that have been described are diffuse (DPVNS) and localized (LPVNS). The knee is the most commonly involved anatomic location, followed by hip, ankle, shoulder, and elbow. Diagnosis of PVNS is not always obvious clinically. Various imaging modalities are often necessary to exclude other conditions and narrow the diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging has become the modality of choice for diagnosing PVNS. We present a case of intra-articular LPVNS with an extra-articular extension through the posterior capsule that has been successfully removed in an all-arthroscopic fashion.

Meniscal Transplants and Scaffolds: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

The reported incidence of meniscal tears is approximately 61 per 100,000. In instances where preservation of the native meniscus is no longer a feasible option, meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and implants or scaffolds may be considered. The goal of this review was to compare the success and failure rates of two techniques, MAT and meniscal scaffolds, and make an inference which treatment is more preferable at the present time and future. Studies that met inclusion criteria were assessed for technique used, type of transplant used, number of procedures included in the study, mean age of patients, mean follow-up time, number of failures, failure rate, and reported reoperation rate. Fifteen studies for the MAT group and 7 studies for the meniscal scaffold group were identified. In this selection of studies, the average failure rate in the MAT group was 18.7% and average reoperation rate was 31.3%. The average failure rate in the meniscal scaffold group was 5.6%, and average reoperation rate was 6.9%. It appears that although MAT is associated with high reoperation and failure rates, the limited number of studies on both MAT and scaffolds and mainly short-term results of scaffold studies make it difficult to make an objective comparison.